Important

This blog is moving to WordPress! The new address is:
http://pinkindle.net

You can subscribe/resubscribe to my RSS feed here:
http://feeds.feedburner.com/pinkindle

Wednesday, January 9, 2013

[Review] Broken by A.E. Rought

Cover Rating: ★★★☆☆
Title: Broken
Author: A.E. Rought
Pages: 384 (Hardcover)
Publisher: Strange Chemistry
Release Date: January 8, 2013
Source: NetGalley

Imagine a modern spin on Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein where a young couple’s undying love and the grief of a father pushed beyond sanity could spell the destruction of them all.

A string of suspicious deaths near a small Michigan town ends with a fall that claims the life of Emma Gentry's boyfriend, Daniel. Emma is broken, a hollow shell mechanically moving through her days. She and Daniel had been made for each other, complete only when they were together. Now she restlessly wanders the town in the late Fall gloom, haunting the cemetery and its white-marbled tombs, feeling Daniel everywhere, his spectre in the moonlight and the fog.

When she encounters newcomer Alex Franks, only son of a renowned widowed surgeon, she's intrigued despite herself. He's an enigma, melting into shadows, preferring to keep to himself. But he is as drawn to her as she is to him. He is strangely... familiar. From the way he knows how to open her locker when it sticks, to the nickname she shared only with Daniel, even his hazel eyes with brown flecks are just like Daniel's.

The closer they become, though, the more something inside her screams there's something very wrong with Alex Franks. And when Emma stumbles across a grotesque and terrifying menagerie of mangled but living animals within the walls of the Franks' estate, creatures she surely knows must have died from their injuries, she knows.


Even though this one wasn't get the greatest reviews, I was still intrigued by the blurb. And as a fan of retellings, I was curious and knew I'd need to pick it up. Well, Broken isn't really what I was expecting, although the blurb does give a lot away. The very beginning is very Twilight-esque: super clumsy girl, mysterious guy whose father is a doctor, reluctant lab partners...you get the picture. Then it becomes the almost typical YA romance.

The first three-quarters of the book is very much romance driven. That's not a bad thing, but it wasn't very interesting. It's a lot of Emma's best friend telling her that Alex likes her and that she obviously likes him, even if she doesn't admit it, and high school rumors. I did appreciate that Emma is confused about her feelings for Alex. She knows she likes him, but she's not sure if it's really him, or the fact that she sees so much of her dead boyfriend in him and she's projecting. Of course, we already know what her attraction to him is, so it was just a matter of her finding out the truth. Like I said, the blurb and the fact that this is a Frankenstein retelling kind of gives the twist away.

Alex Franks is obviously Frankenstein's monster, but how did he get that way? At the very beginning he tells Emma that his father brought him back to life, which doesn't seem to faze her at all. I found it strange that she didn't find that strange, just accepted it and it was never brought up again until closer to the end. There's a lot of wasted pages in Broken, and I think it could have been about 100 pages shorter if the author had gotten to the "mystery" of Alex and Daniel's similarities sooner, rather than dragging out the boring romance aspect. The story is also quite repetitive as we see Emma waking up, getting dressed (with difficulty to remind us she has a broken hand), grabbing breakfast and coffee, meeting up with Bree, going to class, and being walked home every single day. It was unnecessary.

It also suffered from a lot of telling rather than showing. Emma is suppose to be devastated from the death of her boyfriend, but she only tells us that she misses him. Her actions suggest he never existed, until she randomly brings him up again. Emma also occasionally tells us about the conversations she's having rather than there being dialogue. I found that kind of strange, since these were conversations that were supposed to be happening in the present, not her recalling something past. It was just a little awkward to read.

In short, Broken was disappointing. There's no suspense or mystery, and the romance is lackluster. I think if the blurb was more vague, the story wouldn't have felt so obvious. It's not all bad, but I can't honestly recommend it either.

Favorite Quotes

While I can't walk and talk on the phone, I have no problem walking and spooning food into my mouth. Maybe eating is mindless and conversations aren't if you do them right. (2% eARC)


When someone's at a desk, looking down with both hands in their lap, you know what they're doing. (4% eARC)


"Love," he says, "is not science. It's not measurable. Not real." (95% eARC)

Title Quotes

Why did I have to fall in love with a boy so broken? (75% eARC)


Lost so long in the shadows of loss, only to be shoved headlong into unnatural horror and heartache, I can't turn him away. He's a kindred soul. Broken, remade, and my perfect match. (88% eARC)


"Broken isn't dead." If it is, my heart would be hanging limp in my chest. (90% eARC)

Was this review helpful? If so, please vote yes on Amazon.

5 comments:

  1. I hope you enjoy reading this one.

    If you get a chance, visit my WoW.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yup, I agree with basically all of this. Broken has so much potential, but sadly didn't deliver.

    Also, did you read the blog post Rought wrote where she said that female protagonists were "tropes"? UGHHHH. Like seriously, when did being a women become cliché? And wtf, because the main character of this book is female. *sigh* It's hard to respect an author who says those things.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wait, what?! So books should only have male protagonists, because...why??? Just no. Although, Broken may have been more interesting if it had been from Alex's POV...maybe, just a little.

      Delete
  3. I've seen a lot of negative reviews for this one...

    ReplyDelete
  4. Sorry to hear that this one didn't live up to its promise. Love the cover, but think I'll skip it as I tend to get impatient with overly descriptive passages. Hope your next read is better!

    My Saturday Situation

    ReplyDelete

Thanks for taking time to read my post and leave a comment; I really appreciate it! :)